After nearly a month of discussion and data collection, a proposal has finally been successfully submitted on the chain. For more details and reasons for the proposal, please refer to the previous discussion in the Bifrost Forum. I have used the utility. batchAll initiated a proposal to adjust Cliff and Vesting PerBlock, called the methods vesting.setVestingPerBlock and vesting.forceSetCliff respectively, and issued adjustment commands for a total of 61 addresses.
You can check the validity of the proposal by comparing the contents of utility.batchAll with the BNC Loyalty and Lockup Compensation sheet.
In this proposal, I applied the latest parameters:
| Seed PRPR | Private PRPR | Seed CCB | Private CCB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| Max. | 50% | 30% | 864,000 | 648,000 |
Summary, the effect we can get through this proposal: the lower the loyalty of the address, the longer the extended unlocking and cliff time, the higher the loyalty of the address, the shorter the unlocking and cliff time of singing, we can discuss and determine the above parameters, to achieve the desired effect.
Discussions are welcome, and I believe our common goal is to make Bifrost better and stronger!
Bifrost made a proposal to adjust Cliff and Vesting PerBlock. They issued adjustment commands for a total of 61 addresses. The proposal's validity can be checked by comparing it with the BNC Loyalty and Lockup Compensation sheet. The proposal applied the latest parameters for Seed PRPR, Private PRPR, Seed CCB, and Private CCB. The effect of this proposal is that the lower the loyalty of the address, the longer the extended unlocking and cliff time, and the higher the loyalty of the address, the shorter the unlocking and cliff time of singing. Discussions are welcome to make Bifrost better and stronger.